Minor updates 7/21. Going back soon for a full review.
On the way home from dinner at Nel Centro one evening, I was bemoaning the fact that I hadn’t had a good meal since I reviewed Tabla. At that moment, we drove past Higgins Restaurant, which looked completely full. It had been at least five years since my last dinner there, but it used to be one of my favorite restaurants, so I decided to use it for my next review.
The first thing that stands out is the large beer menu, with 48 available by the bottle and 12 on draft. They make up a broad selection from around the world. I can’t think of a Portland restaurant with more varieties. The wine list is also good, with both regular and reserve menus, at an average markup.
There isn’t a house cocktail list. These days, it seems like everyone pushes overly sweet, so-so drinks, and it’s refreshing to see a restaurant sticking to the basics. I’ve had some excellent, balanced cocktails, like martinis, gin and tonics, and an old-fashioned. Prices are considerably less expensive than most restaurants.
With the exception of one meal, which I will detail later, service is always excellent. I felt like waiters were glad to be there, knowledgeable about every aspect of the menu, and efficient. They seem to know when you need them and when you want to be left alone, going a long way towards making an evening enjoyable. One fault, prices on specials are not given during the recitation. I know it’s kind of awkward, but it’s nice to know what the charge will be before you receive the bill.
Appetizers:
Meals begin with good bread and an excellent grassy olive oil. It’s one of the best I’ve had in some time.
I’ve started every meal with the house charcuterie; not because I need to try it every time, but because I really enjoy it. The Higgins version tends towards 10-12 basic meats, with an occasional rillette. I like every single item. The flavors are distinct and clean, never leaving a greasy coating on the palate, each one having its own distinct character. If I had to pick a favorite, it would be the lardo. I don’t know how they cut it so thin without tearing, but it is almost translucent. If you aren’t paying attention to what you are eating, it would be easy to miss the impact, but pay attention, and the flavors are perfectly balanced, slowly building until the lard melts away. Other items include fennel salami, lomo (eye of pork loin), cappacolo (cured pork shank rolled in spices), sopresatta (dry-cured salami), and Napoletana. I highly recommend this charcuterie; it’s the best I’ve had in Portland. Its simplicity belies the attention to detail that has obviously gone into the platter. It’s accompanied by a small, piquant mound of house-made pickles, though one busy evening they were forgotten.
A salad of autumn greens was just what I’d expect, though better than most restaurants. It is a refreshing palate cleanser with slightly bitter greens as a counterpoint to the herb vinaigrette, sprinkled with crunchy hazelnuts and pungent blue cheese.
One evening, a special of forest mushroom strudel was available. It arrived as crusty, light little tubes, with a slightly sweet flavor. The mushrooms came through nicely, with Asiago cheese and spicy greens adding to the profile. A pickled mélange of quince chutney on the side was a vivid and interesting accompaniment.
In early fall, they offered a play on a caprese appetizer, with ricotta instead of the more usual mozzarella. The plate was like an artist’s palette of different, flavorful tomatoes, topped with white, slightly smoky homemade ricotta. Direct and unfussy, this is especially recommended.
Mains:
All of the entrees tend to be quite large, much bigger than I remember from years ago. I enjoyed a special of saltimbocca. The server rattled off the details so fast, I didn’t catch them all, but it was made up of pork loin served with a Coca-Cola reduction, on a bed of some of the loveliest polenta I’ve ever had. As with all the cured meats at Higgins, the prosciutto was wonderful, the final composition creating depth that is not normally present in this dish ($24.50).
A somewhat less successful plate was also the most expensive item on the menu: “magret and confit of Liberty duck”. Margret is literally “the breast of a fat duck”, though it is usually fairly lean. Unfortunately, this breast could have benefited from some fat, as it was somewhat dry, and didn’t have a lot of the flavor one might expect. The same thing could be said of the accompanying confit. The skin was also disappointing, not imparting much flavor. I’ve had much better duck at Ten 01 for six dollars less. Although huckleberries and Italian plums were added for extra flavor, nothing in this dish really shined. All this taken into account, the plating was beautiful, the portion very large, and the meat cooked exactly as ordered. It was accompanied by a nicely prepared side of cooked spinach, but, on this night, unimpressive cheddar polenta. It was all perfectly fine, but not worth the price.
Along with the duck, we tried the pork plate, which I would guess is one of the more popular dishes on the menu. A gastronome’s monument to pork, the “whole pig plate” consists of sausage, braised belly, ribs, rillons, and crepinette. First, there is a bed of basmati rice, a wonderful light, slightly spicy chili verde sauce, and then all the different preparations of meat on top. There wasn’t anything I didn’t enjoy. Though the accompanying sauce changes from time to time, I thought the chili verde was particularly brilliant. It cut the fat and refreshed the palate a little bit with each bite.
This is a huge dish, if anything, a bit too heavy, but there are many out there who would argue with me. The sausage alone is big enough to fill some people. The woman I was with barely managed to put a dent in the different selections, before passing it to me. I didn’t do much better and had enough to take home for a large dinner the next night. As it was, by the time I pushed the plate away, I wanted to slide under the table and take a long nap, but I thought Mr. Higgins might take offense.
Wanting to try the fish, we ordered Alaskan halibut. It was textbook; moist, and slightly perfumed with citrus, nestled in a bed of couscous, nutty, roasted cauliflower on the side. It was complemented by a subtle saffron-ginger beurre blanc, overall much more satisfying than most halibut dishes.
Desserts
I’ve sampled several desserts, and have generally been pleased. Unfortunately, one that sounded interesting was, but not in a good way. It was billed as “roasted figs with honey, gorgonzola ice cream, and spic, d pecans”. The plate was beautiful, the slices of lovely, brightly flavored figs like a crescent moon, the ice cream on one side. My dining companions both ordered it, took a few bites, and then told me I should have a taste of the ice cream before it started to melt. One bite made me recoil, and they burst out laughing. It was overpowering; like eating a ball of gorgonzola. How they tasted it without changing expression, I’ll never know. I think it would have been much more effective with just a hint of cheese, and not the bomb we were served. That said, the figs with honey were excellent, sparking conversations about our childhoods.
Another night, I tried a crostata with huckleberries and bay leaf ice cream. This time the ice cream played a subtle supporting role against the berries, which were cradled in a wonderfully flaky crust.
Lunch:
One afternoon, I decided to drop by the bar, or as they call it, “the bistro”, for lunch. It turned out to be a particularly memorable experience – not because it was good, but rather because it was so bad. Between the three of us, we had soup, salad, mussels, pastrami, and the same halibut I described as “satisfying” above. This was the strangest meal I’ve had in ages.
The mushroom soup was a fairly quick puree, with lots of tiny chunks of what looked like mushrooms. However, it didn’t really have any mushroom taste. Instead, it was overwhelmed by the taste of vinegar, which was so strong, it left my mouth burning. We could barely make a dent in it.
The portion of mussels was large. The menu described them as being “steamed in hard cider with celeriac, apples, and garlic toast”. That sounded nice, but we couldn’t taste any of these ingredients. Every mussel had an undercooked piece of garlic the size of the tip of your little finger stuffed into it. I could see the shellfish, but I certainly couldn’t taste it. Like the mushroom soup, the broth was overwhelmed with the taste of vinegar, also burning our mouths. This was another dish we couldn’t finish.
Unlike dinner, the lunch version of the same halibut dish had issues. The fish arrived on a stack of greens, which were supported on a bed of mashed potatoes. The same person who had ordered them at dinner also ordered them at lunch, so she could make a direct comparison. “It tastes pretty good, she said, but something’s not right.” I reached over with my fork, and thought it was ok, but agreed with her; something was off. Breaking the dish into separate elements, I soon found the problem. Underneath everything was a thin brown sauce, which tasted overwhelmingly of vinegar. How could any of these dishes have been gotten by the chef?
Since the cured meats have been so good in the dining room, I ordered an open-faced sandwich with house-made pastrami. It looked good, a large plate with grilled onions and sharp white cheddar. I took a bite; it was so dry I wondered if my friends knew the Heimlich maneuver. The meat was moister as we got deeper into the sandwich, which made me wonder if it had spent a long period under the heat lamp. This wasn’t the only problem: the meat was tasteless – no tang of cured meat, no salt, no flavor.
Something was terribly wrong in the kitchen that afternoon. Service was friendly but awkward, and the waits were interminable. Every so often, one of the cooks would bring out our plates. We had put 90 minutes in our parking meters but had to rush through the mains and flag the server down. I made it out four minutes after mine expired. No wonder their afternoon business seems to have fallen off.
I have not been back to Higgins for another lunch since that ill-fated afternoon, so I don’t know if this is a strange aberration or a normal thing. The food tasted like someone had mixed up the bottles in the kitchen, and maybe the vinegar and olive oil had been switched, but obviously, the food wasn’t being tasted before leaving the kitchen. Maybe the lunch chef had dropped dead, I don’t know. I do know there was no excuse for what we were served. In a month or two when I’m feeling strong, I will return for lunch, and if it’s better, I will update the review.
Lunch aside, I was generally happy with Higgins. You will walk out the door with enough leftovers for a good lunch the next day. Like most places, there are hits and misses, but Higgins restaurant is generally good and is a nice place to take out-of-town guests.
Ratings:
- Service: A, Lunch: C-
- Atmosphere: B
- Food: B+, Bistro at Lunch: D
Information:
- Phone: 503-484-1099
- Address: 1239 SW Broadway, Portland, OR 97205. Map
- Hours: Dinner: Mon-Fri: 11:30am-12:00am, Sat-Sun: 4pm-12am
- Website: HigginsPortland.com
J&J says
Your lunch review sounds a lot like a dinner experience we had a few months ago. We had exactly the same question: how could some of the dishes that were served have possibly made it out of the kitchen untasted. We had a gristly barely edible steak, completely inedible parsnips, grossly oversalted potatoes, and a host of other inexcusable mistakes for a meal. I suspect we might eventually get back there, based on your review and other comments we’ve heard from friends, but we’re frankly not in a huge hurry to do so. It seems that they have a a real “QC” issue in the kitchen and need to do a better job of insuring that someone is tasting what they send out.
Thanks for sharing your experience there. It’s somewhat encouraging (at least the dinner part). But they need to stop living off their reputation, get their act together and deliver a quality product — consistently, IMHO.
man-o-steele says
I have to ask: why do you spend time reviewing Higgins when there are other places to review that seem more interesting? I would love to hear what you think of DOC, Sel Gris, Belly, Lincoln, Clyde Common, Laurelhurst Market, Thistle, etc. I value your insight and opinion, so could you look at more recent additions to the Portland dining scene.
Food Dude says
I don’t want to distract from the review here, but to quickly answer your questions, I think lots of Portlanders have what a friend of mine calls “the shiny ball syndrome”, rushing to the new places and forgetting the old ones. For that reason, I try to mix up reviews and make sure some aren’t forgotten. Also, Higgins is a major tourist restaurant, hasn’t had a thorough review in years, so it was about time. I’ll let the newspapers rush to the newest places, and continue to mix them up.
Ellen Green says
Thank FD, that’s exactly how I feel about the new and shiny restaurant most of our publication – WM, Oreginain, Mercury rush to review and forget about the estabilshed ones. In addition, if one paper review a new place, all the other ones rush into reviewing the same new place like it is a competition of some sort. Thanks FD for remembering the mixing up the reviews, and putting a serious effort into reviewing, period.
wineguy says
Great review FD. Very comprehensive, and almost makes me want to try it again. Haven’t been for a long time due to some average meals. Also, don’t you think the “bistro” has about zero character? The bar and bar back are nice, but the tables and booths seem almost like an afterthought, bought on the cheap and thrown together. Whenever I’ve been in for a drink I’m always amazed they don’t spruce it up. Could be carry-over apathy from the tired dining area.
Food Dude says
Yeah, I noticed at lunch that the bistro was in great need of paint. It gets so crowded at night, one can’t see it.
pdxyogi says
FD reviews plenty of new restaurants that “seem” interesting. At the same time, it is important to revisit and not forget the still-operating pioneers of Portland (or whatever it’s called now) cuisine. They still have loyal followings, and there are many who are interested in seeing how they are holding up. It’s expensive to maintain this site and pay to dine out for reviews. When’s the last time you donated in order to help facilitate more of these reviews you seek?
justacook says
wow pdxyogi a little harsh there. the guy was just asking a question. it was also fairly respectable.
garden girl says
FD, thanks for this review. I have to say that I have never had a wonderful or truly memorable (in a good way) lunch or dinner at Higgins. I can’t blame it on someone dropping dead, since Greg has manned the kitchen on several occasions. Since the meals were not memorable, I have trouble pinpointing exactly what was wrong or criticizing specific dishes. I do remember that I just wasn’t impressed with flavors, combinations of ingredients or the way a piece of salmon was cooked. I also tried the duck at a friend’s suggestion and didn’t like it. I have found service to be a bit precious and condescending. If we go to Higgins these days,it’s because someone else has invited us and is picking up the bill. Even then, I try to steer them someplace else. I’m quite sad about this, since Greg was a pioneer in heralding fresh and local produce. Unfortunately, as far as I’m concerned, Higgins doesn’t deliver and there are far better restaurants around town.
Jill-O says
I’ve had a good light meal out of the charcuterie plate and a couple of glasses of wine in the bar area, though I will agree, that side of the place has little atmosphere. And I have tried the charcuterie at other venues like Taste of the Nation and some wine events. Whatever else is going on in the kitchen, the curing of meats is done well there.
I also had a mediocre dinner (with service to match) in the bar area with a less than thrilling mussel dish.
My best meal there was about lunch 5-6 years ago – I had a seasonal special of pan-fried razor clams. It was a lovely lunch and the portions were generous (3-4 large clams)…and yes, it was on the restaurant side, which is a nice space. Looking at the menu on the way out I saw the clams were on the dinner menu too…at $10-15 more for the plate. For lunch it was worth the price, for dinner…no way.
I agree garden girl, I appreciate Higgins’ contribution to the Portland restaurant and food ‘scene’ (for lack of a better word) but these days I think there are better places in town, especially for dinner and especially at that price point.
Food Dude says
I should have mentioned that lunch portions are quite a bit smaller than dinner portions, so the price difference seems to be justified.
mzwong says
Glad to see a current review of Higgins. Used to be one of my favorite places but with all of the new restaurants in town I haven’t made it back in years. In the past I never had a bad experience there, and had great meals of just about everything you’ve mentioned, plus an outstanding risotto or two over the years. I appreciate having current reviews on old stand-bys and/or “pioneers” in the local food scene – both to refresh my own memory and remind me of them, and to help in giving good recommendations for out-of-towners.
Thanks!
Food Dude says
Thank you.
L'epicier says
I’ve had the Magret and Confit of Duck there 30 times, it’s always been perfect. The fruit sauce ingredients can vary seasonally, as well they should, but it’s always been spot on. I’ve had it when the breast was a tad too rare though.
I’ve always been happy with their pastrami too. Kenny and Zukes has an amazing pastrami and corned beef but they need to do a much better job of making every sandwich truly great. I’ve been served a sandwich made entirely of the shredded ends of corned beef there, stuff that should’ve been reserved for the corned beef hash.
polarwanderer says
Higgins used to be so good. When they were on top of their game the fish dishes and alsation charcuterie plate were wonderful. I used to work a block away and it was a regular lunch spot and take clients from out of town dinner spot for several years. Unfortunately your chances of getting a good meal have become 50/50 in recent years. The service is still wonderful. The wines by the glass have become too overpriced for what they are and I would prefer more of a focus on local wines. It will always be remembered as a pioneer in local sourcing. These days, so many other places do it so much better. It is akin to the same sad decline of Wildwood. Only people who rely on Fodors and Frommers seam to go to these places now.
Food Dude says
I had some pretty darn good wines by the glass, at reasonable prices, so maybe they have addressed that.
Marshall Manning says
I’m not sure how long it’s been since you’ve been to Wildwood, but I find the items I’ve had there over the past year or two to be better than the ones had in the last few years of Corey Schreiber’s tenure.
cupsncakes says
I’ve been going to Wildwood a lot again and love it, particularly the between-lunch-and-dinner “bar menu” time.
Southron says
We do the same. For those who have been disappointed in the mussels at Higgins, stop by Wildwood on a rainy Sat. afternoon, sit at the bar, order the mussels, and be prepared for an enjoyable experience.
runi says
My husband and I shared the charcuterie plate last week and it was great. Beautiful and interesting flavors in their cured meats. We also split the cheese plate which wasn’t as inspired as it has been in the past, it was still good mainly because of the little nummy things they serve with it such as dates, nuts, apple and pears and a lovely little jam. It’s such a relief to eat good food (whether here or elsewhere)! I hope Higgin’s notices your review and considers sprucing the joint up a bit.
jimster says
I usually find the soups at Higgins, especially the non-veggie ones, to be some of the most inspired soup-making I have experienced (although the French Onion at Laurelhurst Market was incredible the other night). Odd that you got a dud. I generally eat later and in the bar and tend to go with the non-entree faire. Burger is still top-notch, their pastas can be terrific and, as you mentioned, their fish is usually excellent. They have a super-nice wine list that is well chosen locally and internationally as well as the big beer list. I think if you hone it down and figure out what they do and what you like you can have a great experience there. I dig the old school feel to it (that and the VQ are the only places I can think of that have that feel) and while a sweep and update could be in order I hope they keep to the vibe that they have. As far as downtown dining goes it still does pretty well in my book.
RosePetalTea says
I am smitten with the bar menu at Higgins and have thus never made it to the regular menu. Several of the dishes on the bar menu are otherworldly, namely the goat cheese pyramid with balsamic and red wine reduction drizzles, housemade pickles of all sorts, and thin, crisp crostini. The flavor pairings in this dish are inspired. Also, the housemade pastrami sandwich is the best in town (with several close contenders admittedly). The seafood salad is lovely, burger top notch, and soups homey and good. I love the “uncanned” feel of this place, i.e. not all shiny new and trying to be the latest, greatest spot in town. I do agree, however, that Higgins needs an infusion of fresh ideas and energy. A menu that has not changed significantly in years is always a red flag.