My first column of the year is on Champagne. I know you’re thinking, “What kind of a ninny does an article on Champagne AFTER the biggest Champagne-drinking day of the year?” Well, this kind of ninny does. That’s because I don’t believe that Champagne is only a wine for celebrations a few nights per year, and it deserves more attention than the standard “Oh, it’s two weeks before New Year’s…I’d better write the yearly Champagne article” treatment given by most writers. It’s an amazingly food-friendly and terroir-driven wine that excels at the dinner table as well as providing a festive glass of bubbles.
For those who don’t know, Champagne is a specific appellation in France. Despite frequent inappropriate usage of the term, Champagne is only from the Champagne region of France, and doesn’t come from California, nor from anywhere in the United States, which actually allows sparkling wines to be called Champagne. Some enlightened states, like Oregon, have stricter labeling laws that forbid foreign place names (Champagne, Chablis, etc.) on wines bottled in that state. Champagne doesn’t come from Spain, Italy, or any region in France other than the Champagne appellation. It if isn’t from Champagne, it’s simply sparkling wine, both in name and quality.
There’s definitely something special about the Champagne region. From its far northern location to its deep, chalky soils, it produces wines that are different than sparkling wines produced anywhere else in the world. The vignerons here harvest grapes that are considered unripe in most regions, and then ferment them in the manner of most wines. Once that fermentation is complete, the wines are put into bottles with a mix of yeast and sugar (called the liqueur de triage), which starts a secondary fermentation in the bottle. These bottles are then left to age in the cellars until the bottles are disgorged, which is the process of uncapping the bottles, removing the dead yeast cells by freezing the top of the bottle, adding the dosage (additional base wine and usually some sugar) to replace the lost wine and then recorking and packaging the wine for release. While other regions may use the same process, or may call their wine “Champagne”, there’s only one true Champagne, and you can taste it on your palate.
Most wine drinkers are familiar with the big names of Champagne: Mumm, Moet & Chandon, Bollinger, Veuve Clicquot, Louis Roederer, Pol Roger, and others who make up about 75% of the Champagne production, and over 95% of the Champagne exported outside France. While these names are the most popular brands, and they sometimes make Champagnes that are worth drinking (the famous Dom Perignon is produced by Moet & Chandon, and the drink-it-while-wearing-my-bling Cristal is produced by Roederer), these huge producers generally don’t make the best Champagnes. In my opinion, the best producers, and the ones I want to discuss in this article are the grower Champagnes.
Until just a couple of decades ago, most Champagnes were made by the large negociant operations, which bought grapes from numerous individual growers and made them into a wine with consistent house style. These wines were of good quality, but like other blends of grapes from large regions, they also lacked the amazing focus and individual terroir characteristics that are shown in wines from small producers. Slowly, the better growers realized that their top-quality grapes were being amalgamated into large production wines that didn’t show the character of their sites, and so a few smaller growers started to produce their own wines. This trend has continued over the past 20 years and now there are far more small growers producing and releasing their own bottlings instead of selling their grapes to the large negociants.
If you take a close look at the label on a Champagne bottle, you’ll see a small code with a number following it. By looking at this code, you can tell what type of producer the wine is from. The initials “NM” followed by a number indicate that the bottle is by a Negociant Manipulant, or a producer that purchases their grapes from different growers and bottles the wines at a large, non-estate facility. The producers who have an “RM” on the label are known as Récoltant Manipulants, and they are the small growers who produce and bottle their wine on their estates. The other designation to look for is “SR”, Sociéte de Récoltants, who are basically small growers who bottle at a larger co-operative facility, but who maintain their individuality and bottle their wines separately. If you’re familiar with the Carlton Winemakers Studio in Carlton, OR, it’s a similar situation…a variety of independent producers making and bottling wine at one facility.
The wines produced by these small Champagne houses are not as well known as the larger producers, but the quality easily matches, and often exceeds the larger producers. So, you’ll probably have to pay a lot more, right? Wrong! Since these producers don’t have the huge marketing and promotional budgets of the larger houses, the wines are generally less expensive than the big producers. For example, the ’96 and ’99 vintage Champagnes from José Michel, an excellent small producer, were both available (the ’99 is the current release) for under $40. Try finding a vintage-dated Champagne from a large house for that price. The better grower Champagnes are more individualistic, and show more vintage-to-vintage variety than the larger houses. No, you won’t find these wines packaged with all kinds of gimmicks, but does your bottle of Champagne really need a wetsuit anyway (yes, a recent bottling of Veuve Clicquot was encased in what looked like a bright orange wetsuit)?
How do you find these small producers? These are specialty producers, and they are generally handled by specialty importers like Terry Thiese (the Johnny Appleseed of grower Champagnes), Kermit Lynch, and other small importers. Likewise, the quantities produced by these small estates don’t allow them to be sold by the megastores, so they will only be carried by wine shops that focus on the smaller, quality-conscious producers. Besides the Michel listed above, other top small producers include Paul Bara, Gaston-Chiquet, Camille Saves, Pierre Peters, A. Margaine, Henri Billiot, José Dhondt, L. Aubry, and André Clouet.
If you want to try these wines, go to your favorite local wine shop (Liner & Elsen, Great Wine Buys, E & R Wines and Square Deal all carry multiple grower Champagnes), and tell them that you want a recommendation for a couple of grower Champagnes to try. Tell them what type of dishes you’re matching the wine with (Seared scallops are great with Champagne, as are fresh crab, light to medium-strength cheeses, lightly spicy (not sweet) Asian dishes, and some rosés are great with chicken or other lighter meat dishes). And do it on a Tuesday or Wednesday night when there’s nothing else to celebrate but the wine you’re drinking, the food you’re eating, and the person you’re with. That’s when Champagne is at its best!
Rodney says
Damn’it Marshall,
I still haven’t had a chance to buy some Jose Michel yet. You shouldn’t be talking about that one.
Rodney
Pascal Sauton says
I like Champagne in the morning, on a rainy day after a walk on the beach… Or on the spur of the moment, to celebrate the fact that it’s Wednesday…In the first months of Carafe, I use to bring back a bottle home every Saturday night, to celebrate that we made it another week!
Great article, Marshall. Thanks for making Champagne an “everyday wine”! Hell, I’m going to open a bottle tonight!
Remember there are a lot of great sparklings also out there…Cremant de Loire, Cerdan Buget,
etc…
tparr says
Hi Marshall – great piece, nice to hear from you again! Just curious – what’s your opinion of the sparkling wines made in the Napa Valley by French producers, i.e. Mumm Napa, or Domaine Chandon?
Sir Loins says
Great write up, Marshall.
I always have a bottle (or two) of bubbly in the ‘fridge and I don’t need a special occasion, guests, or a fancy meal the pop the cork.
Thanks to a couple of wine stewards I know whose favorite wine is also Champagne, I was steered to a few grower varieties (and Kermit Lynch) back before the dollar took a beating from the Euro. My favorite of the mid-scale “big names” is Bollinger, which used to go on sale for mid-$20s per bottle!
These days, I seek out sparkling alternatives in the “méthode champenoise” style, though I also enjoy prosecco, and other less complex varieties (Cray Crémant de Loire Rosé Brut was a recent nice surprise).
But, to my palate, the Brut that Argyle released last Fall is right up there with the Bollinger that I can’t afford anymore.
Based on your tips, I’ll have to swing by one of these wine shops. Maybe there is something available that won’t ding my wallet too badly.
Marshall Manning says
Pascal, you’re right that there are other good sparkling wines out there, and I’m also a fan of some Vouvray Petillant and Cremant d’Alsace wines as well as the ones you mentioned. However, I find they rarely have the flavor precision and complexity of the best Champagnes, although they are also more affordable, so they definitely have their place.
Tami, I think the Napa sparkling wine producers are okay, but many of them are overpriced relative to their quality. I’d rather spend the extra few bucks to get a good grower Champagne as opposed to the better cuvees from Mumm, Chandon, Domaine Carneros, etc. The basic cuvees, while cheaper, just don’t seem to have that much going for them, and most are very frothy (think 7-UP sized bubbles) and just don’t have the vibrancy of Champagne. I actually like the Gruet sparklers from New Mexico more than most of the Napa Valley wines, and they are available for around $15 or so.
If you’re looking for budget sparklers, try the Gruet or some of the suggestions that Pascal made above, as most of the Cremants from the Loire and Alsace are under $20.
Marshall
pollo elastico says
Pascal – you’re too cool, man! you’ve just inspired me…
Pascal Sauton says
Funny that you mentionned the Gruet. I was one of the first chef to do a winemaker dinner with them back in my Colorado days… As a matter of fact, it was the Sparkling at our wedding as Laurent Gruet sent us 3 cases for it as a wedding present! It really is a good value, and it’s actually better than the one his Dad makes in France!!! Do you know that he has to tranport the grapes in refrigerated trucks from the vineyard to the winery as it is still too hot at that time of year in New Mexico!
I totally agree that French Sparklings lack the finesse of true Champagne, but since I own a restaurant, I’m kind of broke, so they make a great value “everyday bubbles”!
When my wife and I go out, we usually polish a half of Jose Dhondt as we get ready!
Any excuse is a good excuse.
Pollo Elastico: I don’t know what the inspiration was about…but I’m glad I inspired you!
Krista says
Sunday is bubbly day at our house…Roederer Estate is a favorite;Pascal, let’s have Gruet at dinner next Sunday, we’ve never tried it!
pollo elastico says
Pascal – you’ve inspired me to uncork a bottle of the bubbly to…celebrate my daughter’s 20 and 1/2 month birthday. To commemorate a new episode of Lost. To mark the occassion of might alma matter gaining entry into the NCAA tournament –a albeit as a 8 seed — for the 22nd year in row.
Ken Collura says
Marshall — Really informative piece. Portland’s Champagne buyers are well-armed now when heading out to purchase. A couple of comments: 1) Gruet out of Albuquerque is probably the best value sparkling wine made in the United States. I’ve always preferred the Brut to the Blanc de Noirs. Used to run about $11.99 retail in New Mexico. 2) The Jose Michel is dynamite. Light as a feather. Just my style. I really prefer the aperitif style (Billecart-Salmon for example) compared to the yeasty Bollinger style. 3) When searching for non-Champagne French sparklers, look for the cremant de Loire (Chenin Blanc with a little Chard) from great Loire house of Baumard.
Pascal Sauton says
Krista: Sounds good, I’ll get a bottle!
Ken: we have the Baumard Cremant on our list and I love it! BTW, could you email me the name of that Basque white you brought in recently? THX!
Have any of you guys ever had a Krug “Clos du Mesnil”? I had one only once and it was AMAZING! Definitly the best bubbly I ever had… I think it was a 1985 and a friend gave it to us for our wedding. I never had anything quite like it. It was…well…ueh…”freaking outstanding”!
Comments?
Chambolle says
I still have a tremendous soft spot for Krug. One of my bosses cracked a 1969 for me once (birth year), and the bubbles had receded just enough to show what was beneath: incredibly pure and subtle wine.